LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Patel Arf v Kulbul My - 2006 Int 261   flag 

[2006] MUIntC 277
Intermediate Court of Mauritius
Mauritius
26th May, 2006

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text †  Citation Index
Hipgrave v Case [1885] UKLawRpCh 46; (1885) 28 Ch D 356; 54 LJCh 399 United Kingdom 11 Feb 1885 CommonLII flag 26
Tildesley v Harper [1878] UKLawRpCh 284; 10 Ch D 393 Court of Chancery United Kingdom 18 Nov 1878 CommonLII flag 120
Warner v Sampson [1959] 1 QB 297; [1959] 1 All ER 120; [1959] 2 WLR 109 United Kingdom circa 1959 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 80
(1) The court is more strict in granting applications for amendment at the trial than before the trial An amendment which is substantial and raises new issues which are inconsistent with those found in a statement of claim will not be granted – Tive Hive Ors v Kam Tim [1953] Media Review 80 Media Review circa 1953 7
[1989] Media Review 191 [1989] Media Review 191 Media Review circa 1989 5
[2002] SCJ 168 [2002] SCJ 168 Supreme Court of Canada Canada circa 2002 flag 3
Joomun v Kissoondharry [1977] Media Review 256 Media Review circa 1977 7
[1993] Media Review 251 [1993] Media Review 251 Media Review circa 1993 4
[1960] Media Review 127 [1960] Media Review 127 Media Review circa 1960 2
[1966] Media Review 122 [1966] Media Review 122 Media Review circa 1966 4
Bhadain S v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2004] SCJ 33 Supreme Court of Canada Canada circa 2004 flag 4
[2004] Media Review 11 [2004] Media Review 11 Media Review circa 2004 2

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback