LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court † | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Australian Workers' Union v Coles |
[1917] ArgusLawRp 43; |
Argus Law Reports | Australia | 23 May 1917 | AustLII |
|
|
Pepcor Retirement Fund v Financial Services Board |
[2003] ZASCA 56; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 30 May 2003 | SAFLII |
|
|
Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism v Phambili Fisheries (Pty) Ltd; Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism v Bato Star Fishing (Pty) Ltd |
[2003] ZASCA 46; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 16 May 2003 | SAFLII |
|
|
Johannesburg Stock Exchange v Witwatersrand Nigel Ltd |
[1988] ZASCA 18; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 22 Mar 1988 | SAFLII |
|
|
1 Ald 183 |
|
Australia | circa 2003 | LexisNexis AU |
|
||
Self v Munisipaliteit v Mosselbaai |
|
South Africa | circa 2006 |
|
|||
1932 WLD 100 |
|
South Africa - Transvaal | circa 1932 |
|
|||
administrative actions but they do say that quite adequate reasons were given What constitutes adequate reasons has been aptly described by Woodward J, sitting in the Federal Court of Australia, in the case of Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Wraith |
|
Australia | circa 1983 | LexisNexis AU |
|
||
Supply Co (Pty) Ltd v Mpumalanga Gambling Board |
|
Canada - British Columbia | circa 1999 |
|
|||
106 Act 3 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1983 |
|
|||
Bam-Mugwanya v Minister of Finance and Provincial Expenditure, Eastern Cape |
|
South Africa | circa 2001 | LexisNexis |
|