LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Journal Article | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Journal Article | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

"Hamed, Williams and the Exclusionary Rule: Critiquing the Supreme Court ’ s Approach to s 30 of the Evidence Act 2006"   flag  2

[2012] New Zealand Law Review 605
Scott Optican
New Zealand Law Review
New Zealand

Cases Referring to this Journal Article

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction †  Date Full Text Citation Index
Te Arotake Tuatoru i te Evidence Act 2006 The Third Review of the Evidence Act 2006 [2024] NZLCR 148 New Zealand circa 2024 NZLII flag
2013 Review of the Evidence Act 2006 [2013] NZLCR 127 New Zealand circa 2013 NZLII flag

Law Reform Reports Referring to this Journal Article

Journal Article Title Citation(s) Author Jurisdiction †  Date Full Text Citation Index
Te Arotake Tuatoru i te Evidence Act 2006 The Third Review of the Evidence Act 2006 [2024] NZLCR 148 New Zealand circa 2024 NZLII flag
2013 Review of the Evidence Act 2006 [2013] NZLCR 127 New Zealand circa 2013 NZLII flag

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback