LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

O Neill, R v    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text †		Citation Index
Holmes	[2014] EWCA Crim 420	England and Wales Court of Appeal - Criminal Division	United Kingdom - England and Wales	14 Mar 2014	BAILII		3
[2012] Ewca Crim 639	[2012] EWCA Crim 639	England and Wales Court of Appeal - Criminal Division	United Kingdom - England and Wales	circa 2012	BAILII		1
Tedjame-mortty	[2011] EWCA Crim 80; [2011] Crim LR 676	England and Wales Court of Appeal - Criminal Division	United Kingdom - England and Wales	19 Jan 2011	BAILII		2
R v Courtney	[2007] NICA 6	Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland	United Kingdom - Northern Ireland	26 Jan 2007	BAILII		23
R v McCartan and Skinner	[2005] NICC 20	Crown Court for Northern Ireland	United Kingdom - Northern Ireland	circa 2005	BAILII		10
R v George	[2002] EWCA Crim 1923; [2003] Crim LR 282	England and Wales Court of Appeal - Criminal Division	United Kingdom - England and Wales	29 Jul 2002	BAILII		15
R v Fergus	(1994) 98 Cr App R 313		United Kingdom	circa 1994	LexisNexis		38
R v Pope	(1986) 85 Cr App R 201		United Kingdom	circa 1986	LexisNexis		3
R v Galbraith	[1981] 2 All ER 1060; [1981] 1 WLR 1039; (1981) 73 Cr App R 124; 2 Crim LR 767; 144 JP 406		United Kingdom	circa 1981	LexisNexis		713
McGreevy v DPP	[1973] 1 All ER 503; [1973] 1 WLR 276; (1973) 57 Cr App R 424		United Kingdom	circa 1973	LexisNexis		163
English Practice Note	[1962] 1 All ER 448; [1962] 1 WLR 227		United Kingdom	circa 1962	LexisNexis		163
Daley v R	[1994] 1 AC 117; (1993) 98 Cr App R 447; [1993] 3 WLR 666		United Kingdom	circa 1994	LexisNexis / Westlaw		24
R v Turnbull	[1977] AC 224; [1977] QB 224; [1976] 3 All ER 549; (1976) 63 Cr App R 132; [1976] 3 WLR 445; [1976] Crim LR 565; [1976] 3ALL ER 549		United Kingdom	circa 1977	LexisNexis / Westlaw		930
R v Kilbourne	[1973] AC 729; [1973] 1 All ER 440; 57 Cr App R 381; [1973] 2 WLR 254		United Kingdom	circa 1973	LexisNexis / Westlaw		1
‘It is also necessary before drawing the inference of the accused s guilt from circumstantial evidence to be sure that there are no other co-existing circumstances which would weaken or destroy the inference. ( Taper v The Queen	[1952] AC 480		United Kingdom	circa 1952	LexisNexis / Westlaw		124
R v MacMath	[1997] Crim LR 586		United Kingdom	circa 1997	Westlaw		6