LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

[1985] Act 18     6

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court †	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
Northern Territory v Griffiths	[2017] FCAFC 106; (2017) 256 FCR 478; (2017) 346 ALR 247	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	20 Jul 2017	AustLII		8
Kingi v New Zealand Parole Board	[2012] NZHC 3490	High Court of New Zealand	New Zealand	18 Dec 2012	NZLII		1
Petition of UK Agricultural Lending Ltd for Rectification of Documents	[2021] ScotCS CSOH_54	Scottish Court of Session	United Kingdom - Scotland	21 May 2021	BAILII
- Connell v Beal Developments Ltd (LANDLORD AND TENANT - FTT procedure - costs)	[2023] UKUT 135	United Kingdom Upper Tribunal	United Kingdom	14 Jun 2023	BAILII
- Primeview Developments Ltd v Ahmed	[2017] UKUT 57	United Kingdom Upper Tribunal	United Kingdom	7 Mar 2017	BAILII

Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title	Citation(s)	Author †	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
"attractive" remedy than it is at present, by placing it closer to other remedies for breach of a lease, for example rescission Reforming the law so as to provide that rights or liabilities which have accrued prior to the irritancy are not affected would mean that a relevant claim for damages could be made So the landlord, in that scenario, would achieve both the removal of the tenant (as with irritancy presently) and also be able to recover any debts due [271] As noted above, it is generally agreed by stakeholders that irritancy is (and should be) a remedy of last resort Our 2003 Report described the primary function of irritancy as a "compulsitor	[1992] SLC 191	Scottish Law Commission	United Kingdom - Scotland	circa 1992	BAILII