LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

He "Costs contended that the adoption was invalid, Appeal dismissed as the adoption of a daughter's son is expressly forbidden by the Mitakshara, and as his first wife belonged to the same gotra, as his natural father his marriage AII R 1926 Nagpur 215 was not legal and his son the plaintiff is Baker, J C , and Prideaux, A J C illegitimate On behalf of the plaintiff it was con* Jageshioar Tuharam--Defendant 1--~ tended that in the Maharashtra Brahmin Applicant community of Nagpur the prohibition, v under the Hindu law, of the adoption of a Pandurang--Plaintiff--Non-applicant daughter's son or sister's son has Misc Petition No4 17 of 1924, Decide been abolished by custom It was on 18th July 1924, for leave to appeal to held by this Court that the custom had His Majesty in Council against the judg been proved ement of the Court df the Judicial Com It is contended on behalf of the present missioner, Nagpur, D/ 26th November applicant that the question of whether 1923, in First Appeal     1

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
Satrucherla Sivaskandaraju v Narasimha Pattamani	[1932] AllINRprMad 101; [1933] AIR Mad 225	All India Reporter - Madras	India - Tamil Nadu	5 Oct 1932	AsianLII