LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Dattoo "Raoji and others. in fact no appeal at all but a cross-objection and Miso. Civil Case No. 92 of 1942, Decided on 8th no argument is advanced or indeed can be advan October 1945, for leave to appeal to Privy Council ced against the acceptance'of the cross* objection, no against order of this Court, in F. A. No. 64 of 1937, leave to appeal to the Privy Council should be given: D/- 27th February 1942. Observations of Niamat Ullah /., in ('35) 22 A.I.R*. (a) Civil P.C. (1908), S. 110--Substantial ques 1935 All. 374 (F. B.), Approved·; ('32) 19 A. I. R*. tion of law--High Court applying legal principles 1932 All. 65 (F. B.), Dissent8 C. W. N. 294 held to facts of case and rejecting appellant's conten overruled by ('25) 12     3

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text †		Citation Index
L P Lakshmanan Chettiar v Thangam alias Palanichami Chetti	[1946] AllINRprMad 113; [1947] AIR Mad 227	All India Reporter - Madras	India - Tamil Nadu	11 Oct 1946	AsianLII
Abdul Majid Khan v Dattoo Raoji	[1945] AllINRprNag 95; [1946] ILR Nag 609; [1946] AIR Nag 307	All India Reporter - Nagpur	India - Maharashtra	8 Oct 1945	AsianLII
Ram Nath Dave v Emperor	[1942] AllINRprOudh 96; [1942] AIR Oudh 473	All India Reporter - Oudh	India - Uttar Pradesh	22 Jul 1942	AsianLII