LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

SHA " 37 For appointment of a receiver, a person seeking appointment is to make out a case of waste or damage to the property A receiver cannot be appointed merely because it is expedient or convenient to one of the parties to do so or because it will do no harm to do so Though the appointment of receiver is discretionary, exercise of such a discretion is to be based on sound judicial principles A receiver can be appointed in case no other adequate remedy or means of accomplishing the desired object of the judicial proceeding is available It is to be based on a very good prima facie case of plaintiff succeeding in the legal proceeding In order to have a receiver appointed plaintiff not only has to show a conflicting claim to the property but must also show some emergency or damage or loss demanding immediate action It is also no more res integra that normally receiver is not to be appointed where it has an effect of depriving a defendant of a de facto possession which may cause irreparable loss to the defendant The conduct of the parties is also very relevant In Rajeshwar Nath Gupta v Administrator General & Page 32 of 53 OMP   flag  2

AIR 1989 Delhi 179
All India Reporter, Delhi Series
India - Delhi

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name †  Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
M/S Shin Satellite Public Co Ltd v M/S Jain Studios Ltd - Omp 183/2005 [2008] INDLHC 2737 High Court of Delhi India 3 Oct 2008 LIIofIndia flag
M/S Shin Satellite Public Co Ltd v M/S Jain Studios Ltd - Omp 184/2005 [2008] INDLHC 2736 High Court of Delhi India 3 Oct 2008 LIIofIndia flag

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback