LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Chhogalal v Secretary of State   flag 

[1933] AllINRprNag 39
All India Reporter - Nagpur
India
18th March, 1933

Legislation Cited

Legislation Name Provision
Railways Act (Vic)

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) †  Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
[1918] Bom 26 [1918] Bom 26 India - Maharashtra circa 1918 flag 1
[1915] Bom 24 [1915] Bom 24 India - Maharashtra circa 1915 flag 1
[1915] Bom 21 [1915] Bom 21 India - Maharashtra circa 1915 flag 1
(1915) 39 Bom 485 (1915) 39 Bom 485 India - Maharashtra circa 1915 flag 3
(1904) 31 Cal 951 (1904) 31 Cal 951 United States - California circa 1904 flag 3
Great Western Railway Co v Bunch [1888] UKLawRpAC 11; (1888) 13 AC 31 United Kingdom 24 Feb 1888 CommonLII flag 7
(1888) 18 AC 31 (1888) 18 AC 31 United Kingdom circa 1888 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 2
Gas Light and Coke Co v Towse [1887] UKLawRpCh 77; (1887) 35 Ch D 519 Court of Chancery United Kingdom 16 Mar 1887 CommonLII flag 7
(1874) 7 HL 158 (1874) 7 HL 158 United Kingdom circa 1874 flag 93
29 IC 545 29 IC 545 United Kingdom flag 1
5 C & P 380 5 C & P 380 1
trustee who leased the trust property for 30 A v Kharef W B Pendharkar and years with a covenant for renewal for another M N Jog--for Respondent like term) enters into it knowing exactly what Judgment --This appeal arises out of the title of his vendor is, and that the carrying a suit for recovering damages arising out out of the contract eventually is subject to a pos sible difficulty, how can he turn round and say: of breach of a contract of sale entered `although, I entered into that contract with you into on 21st September 1928 by the de knowing of that difficulty, still I hold you liable- fendant Sakharam in favour of the for damages' " plaintiff Jairam The suit was dismissed The rule stated in Bain v Fother in the Court of first instance, but was gill (2) was only an affirmation of the decreed in appeal The defendant has principle enunciated in Flureau v therefore preferred this appeal Thornhill (4) That rule is regarded in The contract of sale was made with 1 India - Maharashtra circa 1924 flag 1
Air 1922 All 9 AIR 1922 All 9 India - Uttar Pradesh circa 1922 flag 1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback