LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Legislation Name | Provision |
Railways Act (Vic) |
Case Name † | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
(1874) 7 HL 158 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1874 |
|
|||
(1888) 18 AC 31 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1888 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
(1904) 31 Cal 951 |
|
United States - California | circa 1904 |
|
|||
(1915) 39 Bom 485 |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1915 |
|
|||
[1915] Bom 21 |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1915 |
|
|||
[1915] Bom 24 |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1915 |
|
|||
[1918] Bom 26 |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1918 |
|
|||
Air 1922 All 9 |
|
India - Uttar Pradesh | circa 1922 |
|
|||
Gas Light and Coke Co v Towse |
[1887] UKLawRpCh 77; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 16 Mar 1887 | CommonLII |
|
|
Great Western Railway Co v Bunch |
[1888] UKLawRpAC 11; |
United Kingdom | 24 Feb 1888 | CommonLII |
|
||
trustee who leased the trust property for 30 A v Kharef W B Pendharkar and years with a covenant for renewal for another M N Jog--for Respondent like term) enters into it knowing exactly what Judgment --This appeal arises out of the title of his vendor is, and that the carrying a suit for recovering damages arising out out of the contract eventually is subject to a pos sible difficulty, how can he turn round and say: of breach of a contract of sale entered `although, I entered into that contract with you into on 21st September 1928 by the de knowing of that difficulty, still I hold you liable- fendant Sakharam in favour of the for damages' " plaintiff Jairam The suit was dismissed The rule stated in Bain v Fother in the Court of first instance, but was gill (2) was only an affirmation of the decreed in appeal The defendant has principle enunciated in Flureau v therefore preferred this appeal Thornhill (4) That rule is regarded in The contract of sale was made with 1 | India - Maharashtra | circa 1924 |
|
||||
5 C & P 380 |
|
circa 1924 |
|
||||
29 IC 545 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1924 |
|